Executive Summary
A law license is not a guarantee of your lawyer’s competence, preparation, judgment, or diligence. You should not assume the worst about your lawyer, but you should understand the basic issues in your case, know what is happening, ask useful questions, watch for warning signs, and make sure important information does not fall through the cracks. The goal is not distrust but informed trust.
_____________
A Law License Is Not a Guarantee of Competence
Hiring a lawyer does not mean you can safely stop paying attention to your own case. That may sound strange coming from a lawyer, but it is true. Lawyers are not all equally competent. Some are excellent. Some are adequate. Some are inexperienced, disorganized, overloaded, poor communicators, or simply not very good at practicing law.
A law license tells you that the lawyer satisfied the requirements for admission to the bar. It does not guarantee that the lawyer handling your case is prepared, careful, strategic, diligent, or even particularly competent. That does not mean you should assume your lawyer is incompetent. It means you should not assume competence blindly.
You must police your own case.
That does not mean trying to become your own lawyer, second-guessing every strategic decision, sending ten emails a day, demanding explanations for every phone call, or insisting that your lawyer practice the case exactly the way you would after a few hours of internet research. It means staying informed enough to recognize when something may be wrong.
Do Not Let Your Lawyer Keep You in the Dark
Another problem deserves more attention than it gets: some lawyers keep their clients remarkably ignorant about their own cases.
Sometimes that is merely poor communication. The lawyer is busy, disorganized, or simply has never developed good habits for keeping clients informed. That’s not good, but at least it’s not intentional. For other kinds of lawyers opacity means that an ignorant client is easier to manage.
If you do not know what motions have been filed, what deadlines are approaching, what evidence has been gathered, what the lawyer promised to do, or what actually happened at a hearing, it becomes much harder for you to evaluate the quality of the representation.
You cannot readily identify a missed deadline if you never knew the deadline existed. You cannot ask why an important argument was omitted if nobody explained the issues to you. You cannot question unnecessary work if you do not understand what work was actually necessary. And you are much easier to impress with jargon and vague assurances if you do not understand the basics yourself.
That does not mean you should assume your lawyer is trying to deceive you. But there is no good reason to remain ignorant of your own case. A good lawyer should want an informed client—one who understands the major issues, knows what is pending, and can tell the difference between a bad outcome and bad lawyering.
Know What Is Happening in Your Own Case
Start with the basics. You need to know what your upcoming hearing is about, what the court is being asked to decide, what relief you are asking the judge to grant, what the other side is asking for, what the important disputed facts are, and what evidence matters.
You do not need to know every rule of evidence or memorize every pleading. But if you have a hearing in three days and cannot explain, even generally, what the hearing is for and what you can realistically expect—or hope—to happen, that is a problem.
At a minimum, you should be able to answer questions like these:
- What is the court being asked to decide?
- What are we asking the court to do?
- What is the other side asking for?
- What facts are genuinely disputed?
- What evidence matters most, and why is certain evidence admissible or inadmissible?
- What are the major risks?
If you cannot answer those questions, ask your lawyer to explain them.
Ask Questions That Actually Test Preparation
Instead of merely asking, “Are we prepared?,” ask questions that produce useful information.
For example (and please, do not ask these questions if you do not know why you are asking them. All that does is waste time and annoy your lawyer):
- “What exactly are we asking the court to do?”
- “What do you think the other side’s strongest argument is?”
- “What are the weak points in our case?”
- “What evidence are we relying on?”
- “Is there anything important that still needs to be done?”
- “Is there anything you still need from me?”
Those questions tell you far more than a simple “Yes, we’re prepared.”
One of the best signs that your lawyer understands your case is that your lawyer can tell you what is wrong with it. Be cautious of the lawyer who tells you only why you should win.
Every case has weaknesses. Every client has bad facts. Every legal argument has limits. Sometimes the evidence is incomplete. Sometimes the law is unfavorable. Sometimes the opposing party has a point.
A prepared lawyer knows where the danger is and should be able to explain it without becoming defeatist or evasive.
Watch for Objective Warning Signs
There are warning signs clients should not ignore. None of these, standing alone, necessarily proves incompetence. But repeated problems should get your attention.
Pay attention if:
- Your lawyer repeatedly seems unfamiliar with important facts you have already provided.
- Important deadlines repeatedly seem to surprise your lawyer.
- Your lawyer cannot clearly explain the purpose of an upcoming hearing.
- Your lawyer has not reviewed documents that are obviously central to the dispute.
- You learn about an important order, filing, deadline, or development and your lawyer appears not to know about it.
- You repeatedly learn significant developments in your own case only after the fact.
- Your lawyer resists reasonable requests to explain what has been filed, what remains pending, or what happened in court.
- Every substantive answer is vague, evasive, or some version of “don’t worry about it.”
- Critical preparation keeps happening at the last possible moment for no apparent reason.
One mistake does not prove incompetence. Lawyers are human. They forget things, misunderstand things, miss things, and sometimes correct course only after a client raises a concern.
What matters more is the pattern. Is your lawyer generally on top of the case, or are you repeatedly discovering omissions, surprises, and unexplained gaps?
Do Not Confuse Anxiety With Lack of Preparation
At the same time, do not mistake your own anxiety for evidence that your lawyer is unprepared.
A lawyer does not need to call you every day before a hearing to be prepared. A lawyer does not need to generate fifty pages of notes for a twenty-minute hearing. A lawyer does not need to rehearse every conceivable question with you, appear visibly nervous, or agree with every idea you have about how the case should be handled.
Visible activity is not the same thing as competent preparation. Sometimes the lawyer who appears calm is calm because the issues are straightforward and the lawyer knows the case.
Police Your Own Case
Keep your own file of your case. Read the important orders. Know your hearing dates and major deadlines. Do the work you need to do as the client. Educate yourself. Asking your lawyer to “tell me what this means” every time he sends you a notice of hearing, instead of first reading it and trying to understand it, is often just being intellectually lazy.
Keep copies of the documents and evidence you have provided. When you send your lawyer something important, make sure it was received.
You should also:
- Tell your lawyer promptly when an important factual development occurs.
- Ask if you believe something important has been overlooked.
- Ask again if an answer does not make sense (but do not say “I don’t understand when you’re simply dissatisfied with the result).
- Keep track of what documents you have already provided.
- Know what major motions and hearings are pending.
- Read important court orders instead of relying entirely on someone else’s summary of them.
You are not being difficult by doing these things. You are protecting yourself.
Your lawyer has many cases. You have one case that may affect your children, your finances, your home, your business, or years of your life. That does not make you the lawyer, but it does make you the person with the greatest incentive to make sure nothing important falls through the cracks.
Cooperative Clients Are Usually Informed Clients
Informed clients usually cooperate better because they understand the reason behind what their lawyer is asking them to do. A client who knows why a document matters, why a deadline matters, why certain evidence is weak, or why a settlement position is sensible is more likely to respond promptly and follow advice intelligently instead of resisting instructions that seem arbitrary.
Informed clients understand the major issues, know what is pending, provide better input, follow advice more intelligently, and are less likely to mistake an unfavorable result for bad lawyering. Information also reduces suspicion. When clients understand the strategy, the risks, and the limits of what the lawyer can accomplish, they are less likely to assume that every disappointment reflects neglect or incompetence.
That makes them easier to work with—not because they are passive, but because they understand how their own decisions and conduct fit into the larger case.
The Goal Is Informed Trust
The goal is not to distrust your lawyer. The goal is informed trust.
Trust should come from demonstrated competence, preparation, judgment, and communication—not merely from the fact that someone has a law license and a framed diploma on the wall.
Hire a lawyer you believe is competent. Then keep paying attention.
Utah Family Law, LC | divorceutah.com | 801-466-9277