Paulson v. Paulson: Premarital Agreements, Expert Disclosures, and Attorney Fees

Paulson v. Paulson - 2026 UT App 108 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS TRISHNA PAULSON, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER PAULSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220914-CA Filed July 16, 2026 Fourth District Court,…

Continue ReadingPaulson v. Paulson: Premarital Agreements, Expert Disclosures, and Attorney Fees

You Don’t Want an Overworked Judge or Domestic Relations Commissioner Deciding Your Family’s Fate

Judge Kasey Wright deserves more credit than ridicule for refusing to pretend that chronic triage is competent judging. On July 13, 2026, Utah Fourth Judicial District Judge Kasey Wright submitted…

Continue ReadingYou Don’t Want an Overworked Judge or Domestic Relations Commissioner Deciding Your Family’s Fate

When the Old Lame Excuses Fail, New Ones Will Be Invented

Judges in child custody disputes should hear from children more often. A lot more often. It should be routine, the presumptive course, the default. Not because children should decide custody…

Continue ReadingWhen the Old Lame Excuses Fail, New Ones Will Be Invented

“I’m Not Trained to Interview Children” and Other Empty Objections Behind Utah’s PGAL Default

At a recent hearing, a commissioner explained why she was appointing a private guardian ad litem instead of interviewing the child herself: "Given the age of the child, the statutory…

Continue Reading“I’m Not Trained to Interview Children” and Other Empty Objections Behind Utah’s PGAL Default

One Opinion, Seven Letterheads: The Family Court Echo Chamber

Christine Miller recently made a point about family court that deserves more attention: the appearance of independent professional agreement where no genuine independence exists. When a court appoints a private guardian…

Continue ReadingOne Opinion, Seven Letterheads: The Family Court Echo Chamber

The Weaponization of Victimhood: A Candid Look at the Inexcusable Bias in Family Courts

“A woman's greatest strength [in divorce court] is her ability to be a victim.” It’s a statement that immediately makes people boil over—either in furious agreement or absolute outrage. But…

Continue ReadingThe Weaponization of Victimhood: A Candid Look at the Inexcusable Bias in Family Courts

The Intersection of Federal Immigration Law and Utah Divorce

One of the most complex, high-stakes scenarios occurs when federal immigration policies collide head-on with state domestic relations law. Under the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a non-citizen spouse…

Continue ReadingThe Intersection of Federal Immigration Law and Utah Divorce

SB 304 Promised a Fix for Weaponized Protective Orders. Read the Statute

Anyone who practices Utah family law has watched it happen. A child custody dispute is going badly for one parent, or hasn't started yet, and a protective order petition appears.…

Continue ReadingSB 304 Promised a Fix for Weaponized Protective Orders. Read the Statute

Protection Without Prejudice

A temporary protective order should do one thing well: protect against the danger actually alleged and shown by nothing less than a preponderance of the evidence. It should not become…

Continue ReadingProtection Without Prejudice

When “More Likely Than Not” Becomes “Maybe, So Better Safe Than Sorry”

A low evidentiary burden is still a burden. That should be obvious. In Utah temporary protective order practice, however, it is often treated as optional. The preponderance of the evidence…

Continue ReadingWhen “More Likely Than Not” Becomes “Maybe, So Better Safe Than Sorry”

The Paper Shield: Protecting Victims Without Abandoning Due Process

Few legal proceedings can rearrange a person’s life as quickly as an ex parte protective order. A judge can remove someone from the family home, restrict contact with children, limit access to…

Continue ReadingThe Paper Shield: Protecting Victims Without Abandoning Due Process

The Standard of Proof Is the Immune System of Family Law—and Courts Keep Suppressing It

This post is a companion to The Bloodletting of Family Law. That post diagnosed a system that mistakes itself for the cure. This one is about the cure the system…

Continue ReadingThe Standard of Proof Is the Immune System of Family Law—and Courts Keep Suppressing It

Trust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

In most courtrooms, a litigant cannot restrict another person’s fundamental rights by repeating untested, out-of-court accusations. If a party tries to prove serious allegations through “someone told me” evidence, the…

Continue ReadingTrust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

Jenkins v. Jenkins – Imputed Income and Fault-Based Alimony

2026 UT App 86 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KRISTINE JENKINS, Appellee, v. EVAN K. JENKINS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20241206-CA Filed May 29, 2026 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The…

Continue ReadingJenkins v. Jenkins – Imputed Income and Fault-Based Alimony

 Ineffective Counsel in Utah TPR Cases: In re A.H.

In re A.H., 2026 UT App 88 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., J.H., J.H., L.H., N.H., S.H., AND E.H., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN…

Continue Reading Ineffective Counsel in Utah TPR Cases: In re A.H.

“I’ll Give It the Appropriate Weight” Is Not a Rule of Evidence

Few courtroom phrases are more soothing—or more dangerous—than this response to a valid hearsay objection: “I’ll admit it, but I’ll give it the appropriate weight.” The phrase sounds disciplined. It…

Continue Reading“I’ll Give It the Appropriate Weight” Is Not a Rule of Evidence

Utah Court of Appeals Reverses Child Abuse Conviction Over Incorrect “Reasonable Discipline” Jury Instruction

State v. Paramoure - 2026 UT App 74 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH,Appellee, V. PHILIP CHRISTOPHER PARAMOURE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20240381-CA Filed May 7, 2026 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable…

Continue ReadingUtah Court of Appeals Reverses Child Abuse Conviction Over Incorrect “Reasonable Discipline” Jury Instruction

The Child Still Testifies—Just “Off the Record”?

I. The System’s Logic When courts appoint custody evaluators and/or private guardians ad litem (PLALs), the justification is usually straightforward: The judge does not want children to testify.So instead, the…

Continue ReadingThe Child Still Testifies—Just “Off the Record”?

The Lack of a Record of Child Interviews in Child Custody Disputes

A 5-part series Series Introduction Modern legal systems run on records. Depositions are transcribed. Hearings are recorded. Police interrogations are preserved. Financial transactions generate digital trails. Making and preserving records…

Continue ReadingThe Lack of a Record of Child Interviews in Child Custody Disputes

Erring on the Side of Caution — Until You’re the One Paying for It

“Better safe than sorry.” Few phrases sound more humane. In the context of domestic violence, it feels morally unassailable. Why wouldn’t we err on the side of safety? Whatever it…

Continue ReadingErring on the Side of Caution — Until You’re the One Paying for It

When the System Resists Hearing from the One Person Who Actually Lives the Case

Seth Godin observed that every important medical innovation of the last several centuries—handwashing, antibiotics, acknowledging the dangers of smoking—was initially resisted by the medical establishment. Not because the ideas were…

Continue ReadingWhen the System Resists Hearing from the One Person Who Actually Lives the Case

State v. Tolman – 2025 UT App 188 – Remote Child Testimony and Preservation Failures

2025 UT App 188 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH,Appellee, v. KASSIE ANGEL TOLMAN, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230006-CA Filed December 18, 2025 First District Court, Logan DepartmentThe Honorable Angela FonnesbeckNo. 191100466 Lyla Mahmoud, Debra…

Continue ReadingState v. Tolman – 2025 UT App 188 – Remote Child Testimony and Preservation Failures

Law Needs Fewer Hired Guns and More Straight Shooters: Why the Legal Profession Must Stop Treating Argumentation as a Contest and Start Treating It as a Path to Truth

Plato’s irritation with the Sophists was never about style. It was about moral purpose. As Jonny Thomason discusses in his Big Think essay (it’s a short read and well worth your time), Plato’s frustration…

Continue ReadingLaw Needs Fewer Hired Guns and More Straight Shooters: Why the Legal Profession Must Stop Treating Argumentation as a Contest and Start Treating It as a Path to Truth

Stephenson v. Stephenson – 2025 UT App 149 – marital expenses

Stephenson v. Stephenson - 2025 UT App 149 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SHAUNA H. STEPHENSON, Appellee, v. KERRY KAY STEPHENSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220469-CA Filed October 17, 2025 Third…

Continue ReadingStephenson v. Stephenson – 2025 UT App 149 – marital expenses

Complacent Rulings, Lasting Damage

“Remember that most people will pretend to operate in your interest while operating in their own.” —Ray Dalio Dalio wasn’t talking about family courts when he wrote this, but he…

Continue ReadingComplacent Rulings, Lasting Damage

Protecting Parental Rights: Why Sole Custody Shouldn’t Be the Default Response

A single mistake shouldn't cost a parent his or her relationship with his/her child. Yet too often, family courts award sole custody based on isolated incidents or "aberrant behavior" that…

Continue ReadingProtecting Parental Rights: Why Sole Custody Shouldn’t Be the Default Response

Ream v. Ream – 2025 UT App 105 – What Does and Does Not Constitute Civil Stalking Injunction Violation

2025 UT App 105 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DEBRA JEAN REAM, Appellant, v. JACOB M. REAM, Appellee. Opinion No. 20230799-CA Filed July 10, 2025 Fourth District Court, Provo Department…

Continue ReadingReam v. Ream – 2025 UT App 105 – What Does and Does Not Constitute Civil Stalking Injunction Violation

My Lawyer Says I Have a Weak Case. I Don’t Believe That. What Should I Do? By Braxton Mounteer, Legal Assistant

If you are considering filing for divorce—or if your spouse has already filed—you’ve probably consulted with a divorce lawyer (or should). You likely have your own views (and blind spots)…

Continue ReadingMy Lawyer Says I Have a Weak Case. I Don’t Believe That. What Should I Do? By Braxton Mounteer, Legal Assistant

Taylor v. Taylor – 2025 UT App 94 – postnuptial agreement and alimony

Taylor v. Taylor - 2025 UT App 94 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JACQUELINE KEMPTON TAYLOR, Appellant, v. MARK BENNETT TAYLOR, Appellee. Opinion No. 20230868-CA Filed June 26, 2025 Third…

Continue ReadingTaylor v. Taylor – 2025 UT App 94 – postnuptial agreement and alimony

Miner v. Miner – 2025 UT App 64 – modifying alimony, attorney’s fees

Miner v. Miner - 2025 UT App 64 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA P. MINER, Appellee, v. JOHN E. MINER, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230278-CA Filed May 8, 2025 Fifth…

Continue ReadingMiner v. Miner – 2025 UT App 64 – modifying alimony, attorney’s fees

State v. Lucke – 2025 UT App 49 – proper waiver of right to counsel

State v. Lucke - 2025 UT App 49 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. SCOTT NICHOLAS LUCKE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230428-CA Filed April 10, 2025 First District…

Continue ReadingState v. Lucke – 2025 UT App 49 – proper waiver of right to counsel

Nelson v. Nelson – 2025 UT App 43 – alimony, income, loan

2025 UT App 43 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS VICKI JO NELSON, Appellee, v. JAMES Q. NELSON, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230483-CA Filed March 27, 2025 Third District Court, Salt Lake…

Continue ReadingNelson v. Nelson – 2025 UT App 43 – alimony, income, loan

What Can a Father Do If, After the Divorce, the Mother, Who Has Custody of the Child, Turns the Child Against the Father?

What can a father do if, after the divorce, the mother, who has custody of the child, turns the child against the father? What can he do? There are many things he…

Continue ReadingWhat Can a Father Do If, After the Divorce, the Mother, Who Has Custody of the Child, Turns the Child Against the Father?

Should High-Profile Divorces Be Granted Extra Privacy Protections in Court, or Should All Divorce Proceedings Be Equally Transparent Regardless of Wealth and Status?

As soon as we start treating people differently, two things happen: 1) the idea of people being treated equally goes out the window and 2) everyone starts claiming, “My case…

Continue ReadingShould High-Profile Divorces Be Granted Extra Privacy Protections in Court, or Should All Divorce Proceedings Be Equally Transparent Regardless of Wealth and Status?

Ragsdale v. Fishler – 2025 UT App 36 – civil stalking – free speech

Ragsdale v. Fishler - 2025 UT App 36 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KRISTI RAGSDALE, Appellee and Cross-appellant, v. GEORGE FISHLER, Appellant and Cross-appellee. Opinion No. 20230023-CA Filed March 13, 2025 Third…

Continue ReadingRagsdale v. Fishler – 2025 UT App 36 – civil stalking – free speech

A Critical Analysis of Court-Ordered Mental Health Therapy in Utah Family Law

In family law proceedings, particularly those involving child custody disputes, courts frequently order parents and children to engage in mental health therapy. While the ostensible intent behind these orders is…

Continue ReadingA Critical Analysis of Court-Ordered Mental Health Therapy in Utah Family Law

What Should I Do if I Feel Like the County Family Court Judge as Well as My Lawyer Have Not Upheld My Legal Rights as a Parent?

This is a good question because the way you have posed the question reflects the problem many people have with the legal system. Your feeling may stem from the court…

Continue ReadingWhat Should I Do if I Feel Like the County Family Court Judge as Well as My Lawyer Have Not Upheld My Legal Rights as a Parent?

Proposed Utah Family Law Legislation I’m Following During the 2025 Session

There are many bills before the Utah Legislature during their 2025 session that I’m particularly interested in and that I am following. One of them is House Bill 33. HB…

Continue ReadingProposed Utah Family Law Legislation I’m Following During the 2025 Session

Krajeski v. Krajeski – 2025 UT App 19 – Separate vs. Marital property

Krajeski v. Krajeski - 2025 UT App 19 Oral argument (Utah Court of Appeals archive): https://youtu.be/LoIy9N8wThc THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS TAMI KRAJESKI, Appellee, v. DAVID L. KRAJESKI, Appellant. Opinion No. 20230174-CA…

Continue ReadingKrajeski v. Krajeski – 2025 UT App 19 – Separate vs. Marital property

Toward Equal Child Custody Awards in Utah: Progress Made and Still to Be Made

Historically, in the state of Utah, and throughout the United States, cultural bias as to which parent is granted primary custody plays a major role in child custody decisions. Originally,…

Continue ReadingToward Equal Child Custody Awards in Utah: Progress Made and Still to Be Made

2025 UT App 12 – Schmidt v. Petersen – civil stalking – burden of proof

2025 UT App 12 - Schmidt v. Petersen 2025 UT App 12 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STEPHEN EDWARD SCHMIDT, Appellant, v. KYLE JEFFERY PETERSEN, Appellee. Opinion No. 20230287-CA Filed…

Continue Reading2025 UT App 12 – Schmidt v. Petersen – civil stalking – burden of proof

2025 UT App 14 – State v. Taylor – Sodomy on Child – Biased Jurors

2025 UT App 14 - State v. Taylor THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. ERIC ALAN TAYLOR, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220712-CA Filed January 30, 2025 Second…

Continue Reading2025 UT App 14 – State v. Taylor – Sodomy on Child – Biased Jurors

The Cause of “Protective Orders Disorder” and Its Cure

A previous post (The Cause of “Protective Orders Disorder” and How to Prevent It.) discussed the trouble caused by granting domestic violence protective orders without a preponderance of evidence. This…

Continue ReadingThe Cause of “Protective Orders Disorder” and Its Cure

It Has Been Suggested That We Have a Special Master Appointed in Our Case. ‘Good Idea?

No, and I’ll tell you why in the context of discussing a newly proposed Utah Rule of Civil Procedure which would be Rule 53A, entitled “Special masters for parenting disputes…

Continue ReadingIt Has Been Suggested That We Have a Special Master Appointed in Our Case. ‘Good Idea?

The Overreach of Utah Courts in Ordering Therapy in Divorce and Child Custody Cases

In contemporary Utah divorce and child custody disputes, courts frequently order parents and children to participate in reunification therapy, family systems therapy, or other forms of therapy and counseling. While…

Continue ReadingThe Overreach of Utah Courts in Ordering Therapy in Divorce and Child Custody Cases

State v. Harris – 2024 UT App 191 – Presumption of innocence, Ineffective assistance

State v. Harris - 2024 UT App 191 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. RICKEY SCOTT HARRIS, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220791-CA Filed December 27, 2024 First…

Continue ReadingState v. Harris – 2024 UT App 191 – Presumption of innocence, Ineffective assistance

“A Child Is More Honest in His Interview if He Knows the Interview Is Not Recorded” Makes About as Much Sense as “The Runner Goes Faster if He Knows He Is Not Timed.”

The overwhelming majority of judges and domestic relations commissioners in Utah will refuse to have the interview of children who are the subject of child custody disputes recorded by sound-and-visual…

Continue Reading“A Child Is More Honest in His Interview if He Knows the Interview Is Not Recorded” Makes About as Much Sense as “The Runner Goes Faster if He Knows He Is Not Timed.”