Utah Rule 108 Requires a Hearing on Enforcement Objections

Christensen v. Christensen - 2026 UT App 104 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JEFFREY CHRISTENSEN, Appellant, v. COURTNEY JESSICA CHRISTENSEN, Appellee. Opinion No. 20240810-CA Filed July 9, 2026 Third District…

Continue ReadingUtah Rule 108 Requires a Hearing on Enforcement Objections

The Intersection of Federal Immigration Law and Utah Divorce

One of the most complex, high-stakes scenarios occurs when federal immigration policies collide head-on with state domestic relations law. Under the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a non-citizen spouse…

Continue ReadingThe Intersection of Federal Immigration Law and Utah Divorce

SB 304 Promised a Fix for Weaponized Protective Orders. Read the Statute

Anyone who practices Utah family law has watched it happen. A child custody dispute is going badly for one parent, or hasn't started yet, and a protective order petition appears.…

Continue ReadingSB 304 Promised a Fix for Weaponized Protective Orders. Read the Statute

Protection Without Prejudice

A temporary protective order should do one thing well: protect against the danger actually alleged and shown by nothing less than a preponderance of the evidence. It should not become…

Continue ReadingProtection Without Prejudice

When “More Likely Than Not” Becomes “Maybe, So Better Safe Than Sorry”

A low evidentiary burden is still a burden. That should be obvious. In Utah temporary protective order practice, however, it is often treated as optional. The preponderance of the evidence…

Continue ReadingWhen “More Likely Than Not” Becomes “Maybe, So Better Safe Than Sorry”

The Paper Shield: Protecting Victims Without Abandoning Due Process

Few legal proceedings can rearrange a person’s life as quickly as an ex parte protective order. A judge can remove someone from the family home, restrict contact with children, limit access to…

Continue ReadingThe Paper Shield: Protecting Victims Without Abandoning Due Process

The Standard of Proof Is the Immune System of Family Law—and Courts Keep Suppressing It

This post is a companion to The Bloodletting of Family Law. That post diagnosed a system that mistakes itself for the cure. This one is about the cure the system…

Continue ReadingThe Standard of Proof Is the Immune System of Family Law—and Courts Keep Suppressing It

The Bloodletting of Family Law: When the System Mistakes Itself for the Cure

For centuries, physicians bled their patients and called it medicine. The patients got weaker; the doctors, confident in their training, prescribed more bleeding. Medicine now has a name for harm…

Continue ReadingThe Bloodletting of Family Law: When the System Mistakes Itself for the Cure

Trust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

In most courtrooms, a litigant cannot restrict another person’s fundamental rights by repeating untested, out-of-court accusations. If a party tries to prove serious allegations through “someone told me” evidence, the…

Continue ReadingTrust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

Fear Wearing the Mask of Reason

On the surface, family court looks like a place of reason. There are statutes, rules of evidence, financial declarations, parenting plans, sworn testimony, judicial findings, and orders written in the…

Continue ReadingFear Wearing the Mask of Reason

The “Best Interests” Standard: Common Factors Judges Consider in Utah Child Custody and Parent-time Disputes

When parents separate or divorce, one of the most important questions is how custody of their children will be determined. Many parents enter the process believing the court will automatically…

Continue ReadingThe “Best Interests” Standard: Common Factors Judges Consider in Utah Child Custody and Parent-time Disputes

 Ineffective Counsel in Utah TPR Cases: In re A.H.

In re A.H., 2026 UT App 88 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., J.H., J.H., L.H., N.H., S.H., AND E.H., PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN…

Continue Reading Ineffective Counsel in Utah TPR Cases: In re A.H.

State v. Collard: Redacting Protective Orders and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

State v. Collard, 2026 UT App 87 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. KEVIN MICHAEL COLLARD, Appellant. Opinion No. 20240532-CA Filed June 4, 2026 Third District…

Continue ReadingState v. Collard: Redacting Protective Orders and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

“I’ll Give It the Appropriate Weight” Is Not a Rule of Evidence

Few courtroom phrases are more soothing—or more dangerous—than this response to a valid hearsay objection: “I’ll admit it, but I’ll give it the appropriate weight.” The phrase sounds disciplined. It…

Continue Reading“I’ll Give It the Appropriate Weight” Is Not a Rule of Evidence

Walking in Their Shoes: The Reciprocal Argument Rule in Family Law Litigation

Family court is not ordinary litigation. In a business dispute, the parties may fight hard, settle, and never see each other again. In divorce and child custody disputes, the parties…

Continue ReadingWalking in Their Shoes: The Reciprocal Argument Rule in Family Law Litigation

The Rule 702 Gap: Why Utah Custody Evaluations Need Real Evidentiary Scrutiny

In a Utah personal injury case, if a doctor testifies that a low-speed collision caused a traumatic brain injury, that opinion will usually face meaningful scrutiny under Rule 702 of…

Continue ReadingThe Rule 702 Gap: Why Utah Custody Evaluations Need Real Evidentiary Scrutiny

Utah Court of Appeals Reverses Child Abuse Conviction Over Incorrect “Reasonable Discipline” Jury Instruction

State v. Paramoure - 2026 UT App 74 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH,Appellee, V. PHILIP CHRISTOPHER PARAMOURE, Appellant. Opinion No. 20240381-CA Filed May 7, 2026 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable…

Continue ReadingUtah Court of Appeals Reverses Child Abuse Conviction Over Incorrect “Reasonable Discipline” Jury Instruction

Credibility Determinations Belong to Courts, Not Custody Evaluators

In a surprising number of child custody disputes, courts make major decisions based heavily on conversations nobody else gets to see or hear. A custody evaluator interviews the child privately.…

Continue ReadingCredibility Determinations Belong to Courts, Not Custody Evaluators

The “Delete” Trap: Why Wiping Your Hard Drive During a Divorce Can Blow Up Your Case

Deleting digital evidence during a Utah divorce can trigger sanctions, contempt findings, attorney fee awards, and devastating credibility problems. Learn how Utah courts treat destroyed evidence under URCP 26, 26.1,…

Continue ReadingThe “Delete” Trap: Why Wiping Your Hard Drive During a Divorce Can Blow Up Your Case

Wilson v. Wilson: Utah Court of Appeals Enforces Divorce Mediation Settlement Agreement

Wilson v. Wilson - 2026 UT App 72 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LISA A. WILSON,Appellant, v. BRAD J. WILSON, Appellee. Opinion No. 20240444-CA Filed May 7, 2026 Third District…

Continue ReadingWilson v. Wilson: Utah Court of Appeals Enforces Divorce Mediation Settlement Agreement

Plausible Isn’t Proof: And “Discretion” Doesn’t Fix It

Stephen Petro recently made a point that should be obvious, but in the heat of litigation, often isn’t: A “reasonable” answer is not the same thing as a correct one. A reasonable answer…

Continue ReadingPlausible Isn’t Proof: And “Discretion” Doesn’t Fix It

NFTs in Divorce: How Courts Value (and Misvalue) Volatile Digital Assets

When a $100,000 asset can become $1,000 before trial, valuation timing—not ownership—is the real fight. If you’re holding NFTs and heading into a divorce, understand this: the court does not…

Continue ReadingNFTs in Divorce: How Courts Value (and Misvalue) Volatile Digital Assets

Emergency Contacts: A List of Local Resources for Families in Crisis (Utah Family Law Guide)

Family law emergencies do not follow business hours. What you do—or fail to do—in the first moments of a crisis often dictates your success in court months later. CRITICAL: If you…

Continue ReadingEmergency Contacts: A List of Local Resources for Families in Crisis (Utah Family Law Guide)

The “Easy Way Out” That Can Cost You Your Kids in Utah: Why Pleas in Abeyance in DV Cases and Innocence Don’t Mix

You’re sitting there with a domestic violence (DV) criminal charge hanging over your head. And you’re innocent. Yet you’re scared. You're distressed. You’re tired. You want it over. Then comes the…

Continue ReadingThe “Easy Way Out” That Can Cost You Your Kids in Utah: Why Pleas in Abeyance in DV Cases and Innocence Don’t Mix

Hiding Cryptocurrency in a Utah Divorce: Harder Than You Think, More Expensive Than It’s Worth

People hear “crypto” (cryptocurrency; Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.) and assume “untraceable.” That assumption gets tested quickly in a divorce. In Utah divorce disputes over property division, cryptocurrency is treated like any…

Continue ReadingHiding Cryptocurrency in a Utah Divorce: Harder Than You Think, More Expensive Than It’s Worth

Using Smart Home Tech to Spy on a Spouse in a Utah Divorce Case?

The modern Utah home is a goldmine of digital data. In a divorce or child custody dispute, it often becomes something else: a surveillance system one spouse tries to weaponize…

Continue ReadingUsing Smart Home Tech to Spy on a Spouse in a Utah Divorce Case?

Pretrial Disclosures Matter in Utah Divorce Cases: Lessons from Prisbrey v. Prisbrey

There’s been (note the past tense) an assumption that creeps into a lot of divorce cases: If the evidence is important enough, the court will let it in. But in Prisbey v.…

Continue ReadingPretrial Disclosures Matter in Utah Divorce Cases: Lessons from Prisbrey v. Prisbrey

You Can’t Decide What You Haven’t Examined: What Most Utah Courts Knowingly Miss in Child Custody Decisions

The Missing Step Courts in child custody disputes routinely make determinations without ever hearing from the child directly—or even reviewing a complete and reliable record of someone who did. That…

Continue ReadingYou Can’t Decide What You Haven’t Examined: What Most Utah Courts Knowingly Miss in Child Custody Decisions

Prisbrey v. Prisbrey – 2026 UT App 39 – late disclosure

2026 UT App 39 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LEONA MARIA PRISBREY,Appellee, V. KENT TERRY PRISBREY, Appellant. Opinion No. 20250070-CA Filed March 19, 2026 Fifth District Court, St. George Department The Honorable Keith C. Barnes No. 234500039…

Continue ReadingPrisbrey v. Prisbrey – 2026 UT App 39 – late disclosure

The Social Media Trap: How One Facebook Post Can Impact Your Utah Child Custody Case

In a Utah custody case, your conduct is not limited to what happens in your home—it extends to what you choose to share online. Social media is not personal or…

Continue ReadingThe Social Media Trap: How One Facebook Post Can Impact Your Utah Child Custody Case

When Courts Refuse to Hear Directly From Children in Child Custody and Parent-Time Disputes

The Basic Logic of Factfinding The Protection Rationale The Expertise Rationale The Record Disappears Credibility Cannot Be Tested The Court’s Position: Real Constraints, Imperfect Tools Institutional Convenience One of the…

Continue ReadingWhen Courts Refuse to Hear Directly From Children in Child Custody and Parent-Time Disputes

The Power of the Prepared Client: Why Readiness Is Your Best Legal Strategy

Divorce is a legal process with emotional consequences—but the court does not care how you feel about your case. It cares about what you can prove, and how persuasively. In…

Continue ReadingThe Power of the Prepared Client: Why Readiness Is Your Best Legal Strategy

Structure, Confidence, and the Integrity of Process – Conclusion

This series has examined a focused procedural question: whether interviews with children in custody disputes should be preserved through authenticated contemporaneous verbatim record via unedited audio-visual capture. The discussion has…

Continue ReadingStructure, Confidence, and the Integrity of Process – Conclusion

Part II – Fidelity, Filtering, and the Loss of Context

In most areas of litigation, original testimony is preserved. Depositions are recorded. Hearings are transcribed. Statements given in investigative settings are documented. Context is retained because meaning does not reside…

Continue ReadingPart II – Fidelity, Filtering, and the Loss of Context

Part I – The Fragility Rationale and the Case for Making and Preserving Records

The Fragility Rationale The most common justification for not making and keeping a record of child testimony rests on fragility. Knowing that the interview will be recorded, it is said,…

Continue ReadingPart I – The Fragility Rationale and the Case for Making and Preserving Records

The Lack of a Record of Child Interviews in Child Custody Disputes

A 5-part series Series Introduction Modern legal systems run on records. Depositions are transcribed. Hearings are recorded. Police interrogations are preserved. Financial transactions generate digital trails. Making and preserving records…

Continue ReadingThe Lack of a Record of Child Interviews in Child Custody Disputes

Utah Court of Appeals: Postnuptial Agreements Can Set Child Support Above Guidelines

Reese v. Reese - 2026 UT App 31 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MAKAIBREE MARIE REESE,Appellee,v.KYLAN REESE,Appellant. Opinion No. 20240830-CA Filed March 5, 2026 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department…

Continue ReadingUtah Court of Appeals: Postnuptial Agreements Can Set Child Support Above Guidelines

Trust Without Verification: The Custody Evaluation Transparency Problem

When the interviews that shape custody decisions remain inside a black box, the court is asked to trust what it cannot independently verify. In Utah child custody disputes, custody evaluations…

Continue ReadingTrust Without Verification: The Custody Evaluation Transparency Problem

Utah Supreme Court: ICPC and Natural Parents – In re B.G., 2026 UT 2

In re B.G. – 2026 UT 2 This opinion is subject to revision before finalpublication in the Pacific Reporter 2026 UT 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF…

Continue ReadingUtah Supreme Court: ICPC and Natural Parents – In re B.G., 2026 UT 2

“Not Offered for the Truth of the Matter Asserted”: Meaning, Limits, and Misuse

In court, neither a party nor one of that party’s witnesses can simply claim to repeat what someone else said and expect the judge to treat it as proof. As…

Continue Reading“Not Offered for the Truth of the Matter Asserted”: Meaning, Limits, and Misuse

Why Can’t I Just Submit a Letter as Evidence in Court?

What “Laying Foundation” Actually Means One of the most common frustrations in Utah divorce cases is this: a party has a letter, email, report, or written statement that feels decisive—and…

Continue ReadingWhy Can’t I Just Submit a Letter as Evidence in Court?

The Price of Professionalism: The Pro Se Paradox in Family Court

The "Rules for Thee, But Not for Me" Phenomenon The legal system is built on procedure. For an attorney, failing to file a motion on time or improperly authenticating a…

Continue ReadingThe Price of Professionalism: The Pro Se Paradox in Family Court

What Utah Law Actually Says About Hearing From Children in Custody Cases

In the prior discussion, I described a common feature of Utah custody and parent-time proceedings: courts routinely make findings about a child’s needs, attachments, and lived experience without hearing directly…

Continue ReadingWhat Utah Law Actually Says About Hearing From Children in Custody Cases

What Counts as “Testimony” When the Court Hears From a Child

In the prior two posts, I described a common feature of Utah custody and parent-time proceedings: courts routinely make findings about a child’s needs, relationships, and lived experience without hearing…

Continue ReadingWhat Counts as “Testimony” When the Court Hears From a Child

When the System Resists Hearing from the One Person Who Actually Lives the Case

Seth Godin observed that every important medical innovation of the last several centuries—handwashing, antibiotics, acknowledging the dangers of smoking—was initially resisted by the medical establishment. Not because the ideas were…

Continue ReadingWhen the System Resists Hearing from the One Person Who Actually Lives the Case

When Can Things Be Submitted to the Court?

Every year, I watch people bring “important” documents to court that the judge will never read. Emails. Text messages. Financial records. Therapist letters. Receipts. Recordings. Sometimes the most important material…

Continue ReadingWhen Can Things Be Submitted to the Court?

The Muzzled Meadow

I. The Founding TraumaIn the Meadow, everyone agreed on one thing: voices were dangerous.It hadn’t always been so. Long ago, animals spoke plainly. Some spoke well, somepoorly, some too much.…

Continue ReadingThe Muzzled Meadow

Why This Debate Is So Often Avoided in Utah Child Custody Cases

This post is the fourth in a four-part series examining Utah courts’ reliance on guardians ad litem (GALs), private guardians ad litem (PGALs), and custody evaluators, and the legal, procedural,…

Continue ReadingWhy This Debate Is So Often Avoided in Utah Child Custody Cases

Restoring Judicial Fact-Finding in Utah Child custody Cases: Adjudication Without Synthetic Substitutes

This post is the third in a four-part series examining Utah courts’ reliance on guardians ad litem (GALs), private guardians ad litem (PGALs), and custody evaluators, and the legal, procedural,…

Continue ReadingRestoring Judicial Fact-Finding in Utah Child custody Cases: Adjudication Without Synthetic Substitutes