Trust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

In most courtrooms, a litigant cannot restrict another person’s fundamental rights by repeating untested, out-of-court accusations. If a party tries to prove serious allegations through “someone told me” evidence, the…

Continue ReadingTrust Me Is Not Evidence: The Custody Black Box in Utah Family Court

The Difference Between “Joint Custody” and Equal Custody in Utah Child Custody Disputes

In Utah, "joint physical custody" doesn't have to mean a perfect 50/50 split, though that is increasingly common (increasingly common, not the default—the system still treats mothers more favorably than…

Continue ReadingThe Difference Between “Joint Custody” and Equal Custody in Utah Child Custody Disputes

Is the Term “Neurodivergent” Being Bandied About in Family Law Circles as a Way of Manipulating the Courts?

Yes. The term “neurodivergent” is increasingly being used in family law not only as a genuine descriptive category but also as a rhetorical and strategic tool. Here’s how it’s being manipulated: As…

Continue ReadingIs the Term “Neurodivergent” Being Bandied About in Family Law Circles as a Way of Manipulating the Courts?

When “Different” Is Confused With “Dangerous” (or at Least Unfit)

A homeschooling mother loses custody because the judge disapproves of her "unstructured" educational approach—despite her children testing above grade level. A tattooed father faces restricted visitation because his appearance suggests…

Continue ReadingWhen “Different” Is Confused With “Dangerous” (or at Least Unfit)