One of the most common sources of conflict between co-parents is not just custody exchanges, holiday schedules, or even the monthly child support payment. Often, it is the steady stream of expenses connected to a child’s school, sports, lessons, clubs, and activities.
Soccer fees. Dance costumes. School supplies. Club dues. Musical instruments. Athletic equipment. Field trips. Uniforms. Camps. Travel tournaments. Private coaching. These costs add up quickly. When the decree, custody order, or parenting plan does not clearly say who pays for what, conflict is almost inevitable.
Base Child Support Is Not Just a Groceries and Shoes Payment
A common misconception is that base child support covers only food, clothing, part of rent, and a few household expenses, while the other parent must still pay half of every school fee, extracurricular activity, sport, club, lesson, uniform, camp, or similar cost.
That is not the law in Utah.
Base child support is not merely a grocery payment. It is the presumptive contribution toward the ordinary costs of raising a child. Ordinary school and activity expenses are generally presumed to be included in regular child support unless the parents agree otherwise, the court order provides otherwise, or the court makes proper findings supporting an additional obligation.
Utah law separately addresses medical insurance, uninsured medical and dental expenses, and work-related child care. Those categories are different because the statutes treat them differently. Ordinary school fees, extracurricular activities, sports, clubs, lessons, and similar expenses are not automatically separate add-ons to base child support.
The Utah Cases Matter
In Davis v. Davis, 2011 UT App 311, the Utah Court of Appeals explained that child-rearing expenses not statutorily distinguished from regular child support should be treated as part of the child support award. The court also explained that expenses such as private school, extracurricular activities, and advanced placement tests generally must be budgeted as part of child support if the parents cannot agree otherwise.
In Christensen v. Christensen, 2017 UT App 120, the Utah Court of Appeals applied the same principle from the other direction. The court rejected the idea that a parent could pay school expenses instead of paying court-ordered child support. The rule cuts both ways: a parent receiving support generally cannot demand separate reimbursement for ordinary school and activity expenses absent agreement or order language, and a paying parent generally cannot unilaterally pay those expenses and treat them as a substitute for child support.
An unpublished Utah Court of Appeals decision, Veysey v. Veysey, later recognized the same distinction, describing medical and daycare expenses as categories separated by statute from other child-rearing expenses presumably covered by base support.
In plain English: child support is not “base support plus half of everything else.”
Reasonable Does Not Always Mean Separately Reimbursable
Parents often confuse two different questions. First: is the expense reasonable or good for the child? Second: is the other parent legally required to reimburse part of it in addition to paying child support?
Those are not the same question.
A soccer registration fee may be reasonable. Music lessons may be good for a child. A school club may be worthwhile. But the fact that an expense is reasonable, child-centered, or beneficial does not automatically make it separately reimbursable.
A parent seeking contribution for such expenses usually needs one of three things: a written agreement, clear order language, or a court order supported by proper findings. Without one of those, ordinary school and activity expenses generally fall within regular child support.
This is not a license for a paying parent to be cheap, obstructive, or uninvolved. Good parents support their children’s education, interests, talents, and activities when reasonably possible. But good parenting and legal reimbursement are not the same thing. The law is concerned not only with whether the expense benefits the child, but also with whether one parent had the right to commit the other parent financially.
Unilateral Enrollment Creates Problems
One of the most common disputes arises when one parent signs a child up for an activity first and asks for money later. That is risky at best.
A parent who enrolls a child in an activity without consulting the other parent is in a weak position when seeking reimbursement, especially if the activity is optional, expensive, interferes with parent-time, or was never discussed in advance.
Private school, elite competitive sports, major travel teams, specialized coaching, expensive equipment, out-of-state tournaments, hotel costs, airfare, and high-cost camps should be addressed expressly in the decree, custody order, parenting plan, or a later written agreement. A $40 school fee, a $150 rec league registration, and a $6,000 travel-team season are not the same practical problem.
What a Good Order Should State
A well-drafted parenting plan identifies which expenses are shared, when written approval is required, how costs are divided, what documentation is necessary, when reimbursement is due, and how parent-time conflicts will be handled.
Sample language may include:
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Order, base child support shall be deemed to include ordinary school, extracurricular, activity, club, sport, lesson, camp, equipment, uniform, and similar child-related expenses. Neither parent shall be required to contribute to elective extracurricular, school, club, sport, lesson, camp, equipment, uniform, travel, or similar expenses unless the expense is agreed to in writing by both parents before it is incurred or is specifically ordered by the Court.
For any agreed shared expense, the parent seeking reimbursement shall provide proof of payment within 14 days after incurring the expense. The reimbursing parent shall pay his or her agreed share within 14 days after receiving proper documentation.
Clear Orders Prevent Future Fights
If the order is silent, the default is not that the other parent automatically pays half. Under Davis and Christensen, school fees and extracurricular expenses generally fall within regular child support unless the parents agree otherwise or the court properly orders otherwise.
Because Utah law generally treats ordinary school and extracurricular expenses as part of regular child support unless the parties agree or the court orders otherwise, parents should not rely on assumptions or after-the-fact reimbursement demands. Clear orders prevent predictable fights.
Important Caveat for Joint Physical Custody Cases
There is an important caveat in joint physical custody cases.
Utah Code § 81-9-101(8) defines “joint physical custody” to mean that the child stays overnight with each parent more than 30% of the year and “both parents contribute to the expenses of the minor child in addition to paying child support.” That phrase is not a model of clarity, but it matters.
The better reading is that § 81-9-101(8) does not create an automatic right to reimbursement for every school fee, extracurricular activity, sport, lesson, club, camp, uniform, or optional expense. It does not say how expenses are divided. It does not say whether advance consent is required. It does not say whether expenses are split equally, divided proportionally by income, or shared only if agreed to in writing.
Even so, parents should not ignore the statute. In practice, many Utah courts treat this language generously in joint physical custody cases and expect both parents to contribute to at least some child-related expenses beyond the monthly child support transfer. That is especially true when the expense is ordinary, child-centered, affordable, consistent with the child’s history, and not being used to interfere with the other parent’s parent-time.
So the practical rule is this: Davis and Christensen help defeat the myth that child support means “base support plus half of everything else,” but § 81-9-101(8) gives courts room—especially in joint physical custody cases—to require shared contribution to additional child expenses when the facts and the order support it.
That is why clear drafting matters. Joint physical custody orders should not merely say that both parents will “share child-related expenses.” They should identify which expenses are shared, whether advance written agreement is required, how costs are divided, what documentation is required, when reimbursement is due, and how parent-time conflicts will be handled.
Utah Family Law, LC | divorceutah.com | 801-466-9277